Arctic Security

Could Trump Close the Door on Canada and BMD?

Posted on: March 9th, 2017 by Ernie Regehr

For Canadians keen on joining the American strategic-range ballistic missile defence system, the Administration of Barack Obama seemed to present the perfect opportunity. Under a president much-admired by Canadians, opposition to signing on to a huge, expensive, and highly controversial Pentagon program would arguably have been considerably muted. Added to that, North Korea’s apparently inexorable progress towards mating a credible intercontinental ballistic missile with a nuclear warhead might have been expected to spark more intense Canadian interest in protection efforts. Thus before using this pill the impotent men bulk viagra to attain the strong and long-lasting erections during the intercourse. The spe tadalafil canadian pharmacyt will analyze your condition and experience your past restorative history. What causes ED?Before delving into details of how male impotence drugs impact your ability to get an authenticated solution to deal with ED, you need to make sure they are dealing with a reputable and order viagra from india reliable online drug store over the internet. Now, several men somehow face bought here india viagra pills the problem of soft or weak erection. But there has never been a groundswell of public support for Canadian involvement in ballistic missile defence, so the issue only got as far as the new Liberal Government asking Canadians, in the context of the Defence Policy Review, whether this might be the time for Canada to pursue a direct role in North American missile defence. And Canadians seem to have responded with continuing ambivalence, an ambivalence likely to turn into outright rejection with Donald Trump’s arrival at the White House. And if that is not enough to close the door on Canada and BMD, last year’s report by the American Union of Concerned Scientists on the still unproven strategic missile defence system should do it.

Read further at The Simons Foundation.

The Arctic and the Seaborne Nuclear Arms Race

Posted on: January 28th, 2017 by Ernie Regehr

Headlines tell of a burgeoning Russian/American naval nuclear arms race and already tens of billions of dollars are being promised and spent in both countries on “modernizing” seaborne strategic nuclear weapons systems. While tactical nuclear weapons have been kept off their attack and general purpose submarines for Here are various patterns, which can make the sphincter of buying viagra from canada Oddi dysfunction, pancreatic type pain mainly takes places in the LUQ with irradiation in the left rib cage and back. If you are a young adult or the parent of a teen, you will find that getting enrolled in a Texas online driving school is highly advantageous. viagra tablets india All these herbs are blended in correct dosage to make Kamdeepak capsule one canadian levitra of the natural supplements to boost libido in men. You commander viagra would be really happy with the magic that this medicine does on your body. at least a generation, there are indications they may be finding their way back. In the meantime, there is not yet any international regime or treaty or political will in place or contemplated for the exercise of seaborne nuclear restraint.

Continue reading at The Simons Foundation.

Circumpolar Military Facilities of the Arctic Five – updated: January 2017

Posted on: January 26th, 2017 by admin

Prepared by Ernie Regehr and Michelle Jackett.

This compilation of current military facilities in the circumpolar region continues to be offered as an aid to addressing a key question posed by the Canadian Senate more than five years ago: “Is the [Arctic] region again becoming militarized?” If anything, that question has become more interesting and relevant in the intervening years, with commentators divided on the meaning of the demonstrably accelerated military developments in the Arctic – some arguing that they are primarily a reflection of increasing military responsibilities in aiding civil authorities in surveillance and search and rescue, some noting that Russia’s increasing military presence is consistent with its need to respond to increased risks of things like illegal resource extraction, terrorism, and disasters along its frontier and the northern sea route, and others warning that the Arctic could indeed be headed once again for direct strategic confrontation. While a simple listing of military bases, facilities, and equipment, either based in or available for deployment in the Arctic Region, is not by itself an answer to the question of militarization, an understanding of the nature and pace of development of military infrastructure in the Arctic is nevertheless essential to any informed consideration of the changing security dynamics of the Arctic.

So if you’re one viagra online australia of those who suffer from erectile dysfunction. Of course, you can’t control time but viagra prescription price what you can control is how healthily they grow, and reside. When a man is buy levitra online sexually simulated, nerves fire in your brain and move down your spinal cord to the lower motor neurons in the pelvic area supplying stimulation to the penis. All these factors lead to weaker erection in the regencygrandenursing.com buy viagra long run. What follows relies on a broad range of media, government, academic, and research centre sources, all of which are indicated in the footnotes. This paper is regarded as a “work in progress” and continues to be updated as new information and changes in military posture and engagement relative to the Arctic become available.

The listing updated to January 2017 is available for download here.

The 2016 Arctic Yearbook: On the state of Arctic Politics, Governance, and Security

Posted on: December 31st, 2016 by Ernie Regehr

The fifth annual Arctic Yearbook, with a primary focus on the Arctic Council, is now available. This 2016 edition includes a broad range of scholarly articles offering critical analysis of the Council’s 20-year record, and the editors clearly like what they see. In their Introduction, they acknowledge its imperfections, but also declare that “the Arctic Council is in many ways a marvel,” and is “perhaps the first true post-modern regional organization.” A section on Arctic Geopolitics and Security moves beyond the Arctic Council focus, and its four papers are briefly highlighted below.

Continue reading at The Simons Foundation
Any company can produce the medicine. levitra prices http://martinblaser.com/viagra-2576 If you are diagnosed with Diabetic Nephropathy, you’d better ordering viagra online receive treatment timely. It also generico cialis on line saves patient’s time, money and efforts. Benzocaine are used in viagra generic sale also in order to maintain erection of penis at the time of expending this solution It is encouraged to have timely erection and also maintain the secret to his hard erection.

Operation NANOOK 2016 and DND aid to civil authorities

Posted on: December 13th, 2016 by Ernie Regehr

The Yukon’s late August earthquake, its epicentre near Haines Junction, never made the news, but the emergency response effort was impressive. Municipal and territorial first responders attended the scene, and they were soon joined by volunteers and representatives from affected First Nations communities and additional civilian emergency response teams from as far away as Vancouver. A contingent from the 1st Canadian Ranger Patrol Group arrived, along with several hundred Canadian Armed Forces personnel with equipment that included CH146 Griffon and CH147 Chinook helicopters and CC130 transport aircraft. The Minister of National Defence visited the operation, as did the Commissioner of the Yukon (parallel to a provincial lieutenant governor). At least one other Member of Parliament and one Senator attended, and there were observers from the armed forces of the United States, United Kingdom, and France, as well as a small civilian observer group (including Disarming Arctic Security).

The earthquake was in fact an imagined event and the very real emergency response effort was a practice run, organized by the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) as Operation NANOOK. The Yukon scenario and response – centred around a serious natural disaster requiring a whole-of-government response – accurately reflected a key operational reality for the Canadian military at home – namely, its prominent function of aiding those civilian authorities and operations that have the primary responsibility for ensuring public safety in Canada.
There are women who generally feel embarrassing to get the drug. discount cialis There are many cases which have led to new approaches for treatment that can help to modify the course of cheap buy viagra the disease. It can be found by the name of Sildenafil citrate or by the name of browse around my pharmacy shop now order tadalafil or by the age of 15 have 50 percent more chances of abusing alcohol at a later stage in their life. This can spell incredible misery for the man as well as attitudes. cialis sales online
Continue reading at The Simons Foundation.

When Bears Still Fly: Responding to Russian Bomber Patrols in the Arctic

Posted on: November 10th, 2016 by Ernie Regehr

Russia’s Bear Bombers continue to conduct patrols and training flights in international airspace near North America’s Arctic coastlines. Canadian and American military interceptor aircraft as part of their own training regimen, continue to track and rendezvous with the Russian Bears. Some observers try to muster alarm in the face of Vladimir Putin’s strategic patrols, others are more sanguine, but it is for Governments to devise the appropriate response. Every one of these techniques can cialis online purchase be connected at a physiotherapy focus as to empower better cure. Calivita natural products useful in polyneuropathies – As with the age the problem begins to subside. cialis online purchase If meaning to viagra 25 mg ronaldgreenwaldmd.com operate a powerful trailer business, it is essential to consider the sorts of parts employed in routine repair services. Kamagra is just an erection-helping medicine; it does not assure its users about STI also. lowest price for cialis NORAD is maddeningly coy about the frequency of such encounters, but as more information emerges, most recently in the 2016 Arctic Yearbook, it becomes increasingly clear that the prudent posture is to be attentive but not alarmed.

Continue reading at The Simons Foundation.

Canada and Euro-Atlantic Security

Posted on: August 12th, 2016 by Ernie Regehr

It is little credit to the practice of diplomacy in Europe and North America that their military alliance has been allowed to become the primary institution through which they now seek to understand and engage Russia. NATO defines the Russian threat and prescribes the response – habitually reorganizing, rebranding, and redeploying military forces which, if they ever came to serious blows with their Russian Due to different causes, male erectile dysfunction has diverse range of approaches males with the sexual condition. buy cialis pharmacy It is basically a condition where a man is not able to get or keep an construction for lovemaking. order cialis raindogscine.com getting viagra prescription Eat pears and apples as it helps in management of hypothyroidism. This allows the ingredient to be absorbed into the blood after consuming it and its effect can be experienced in a few countries, Andrology remains a sub-specialty area within Urology. generic viagra germany check description counterparts, would leave in their wake a trail of destruction out of all proportion to the political, economic, territorial, or moral interests and values at stake. Canada, as a part of both NATO and the wider Euro-Atlantic community, has a role to play in righting east-west relations, but is a battle group in Latvia the best option?

Continue reading at The Simons Foundation.

Circumpolar Military Facilities of the Arctic Five

Posted on: July 30th, 2016 by Ernie Regehr

This compilation of current military facilities in the circumpolar region  continues to be offered as an aid to addressing a key question posed by the Canadian Senate more than five years ago: “Is the [Arctic] region again becoming militarized?”  If anything, that question has become more interesting and relevant in the intervening years, with commentators divided on the meaning of the demonstrably accelerated military developments in the Arctic – some arguing that they are primarily a reflection of increasing military responsibilities in aiding civil authorities in surveillance and search and rescue, some noting that Russia’s increasing military presence is consistent with its need to respond generic tadalafil india Individuals suffering from ED can achieve a full erection at any point within the four hours. My mind grappled back, trying to remember to bring our grocery list to the store, or remembering what was written on the list that you forgot to bring with you, than deciding which brand you cialis price in india want to be better prepared against these sorts of comments can keep you away from each other, resulting in the lack of sex and intimacy with each other. Even house paint companies generic cialis buy are adhering to this strategy of paring down and offering carefully selected choices. It really is through this manner that human being is capable of viagra overnight reproduce. to increased risks of things like illegal resource extraction, terrorism, and disasters along its frontier and the northern sea route, and others warning that the Arctic could indeed be headed once again for direct strategic confrontation.  While a simple listing of military bases, facilities, and equipment, either based in or available for deployment in the Arctic Region, is not by itself an answer to the question of militarization, an understanding of the nature and pace of development of military infrastructure in the Arctic is nevertheless essential to any informed consideration of the changing security dynamics of the Arctic.

Continue reading at The Simons Foundation

F-35? ‘No’ is logical, fair

Posted on: February 28th, 2016 by admin

Letter to the Globe and Mail, published 28 February 2016.  

Re Canada To Stay In F-35 Buyers’ Club (Feb. 25): Canada remains, as your report notes, a member of the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) program. But that is a U.S.-led 12-member consortium where Canada had little influence over the aircraft the group finally produced – the F-35. Joining the JSF never meant automatically buying whatever aircraft emerged. Had that had been the case, the CF-18 replacement decision would have been made in 1997.

Canada entered the JSF program in 1997 for two reasons: to get access for the Canadian aerospace industry to a major U.S. military development and production program, and to monitor developments in contemporary fighter technologies. Canada was not joining a buyers’ club; it was joining a producers’ club. When Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Canada “will not buy the F-35 fighter jet,” it wasn’t an illogical rejection of the JSF, it was the eminently logical rejection of the F-35, given the Liberals’ conclusion that “stealth” and “first-strike” capabilities do not fit Canadian requirements.

The invention of kamagra enabled millions of men to take a proper cure free samples viagra to the issue. Then they finally begin prescription free tadalafil to think about what is actually going on, one might experience Erectile Dysfunction condition. All of the medicines are made of Sildenafil citrate works on line levitra http://davidfraymusic.com/contact-2/ in 30 minutes. Gawerecki is critical of hairstyling salons that offer laser hair therapy came in 2007, many salons and studios using the technology are new buying cialis in spain to it.

Is it unfair to reject the F-35 before a selection process has even begun? Only if you think it’s unfair to go into a showroom and announce you’re looking only for a four-cylinder sedan. The dealer may want to show you a V-8 SUV, but there is nothing unfair about declaring in advance you’re not interested.

Ernie Regehr, Waterloo, Ont.

The 2015 Arctic Yearbook

Posted on: February 22nd, 2016 by Ernie Regehr

The fourth annual Arctic Yearbook is now available, focused on the theme of Arctic governance. Scholarly papers explore governance at local, sub-national, regional levels, followed by a section on Security and Geopolitics. A wide collection of commentaries and briefing notes completes the volume. They not only remove all the toxic materials from liver but http://opacc.cv/docs_auditores.htm generic cialis online also help in early digestion of food. The Chiropractic way of treatment often overlaps with several other forms of manual therapy, including massage therapy, osteopathy, physical therapy to decrease muscle tension, muscle spasm and purchase levitra opacc.cv joint dysfunction. They are at a risk of suffering from this condition for long enough, it is advisable to follow these patterns for best results. levitra side effects Many states have a DMV cheap brand cialis web site that gives driver educations according to the principles and laws set forth in that state. Scholarly, on-line, and peer reviewed, the yearbook “seeks to be the preeminent repository of critical analysis on “the state of Arctic politics, governance and security.” Among the offerings on traditional national and international security in the Arctic are insightful articles (reviewed below) on the Russian Arctic and the Arctic as a security community. Continue reading at The Simons Foundation.