Author Archive

Cancelling the Saudi Arms Deal

Posted on: December 20th, 2018 by Ernie Regehr

The following letter to the editor appeared in the Globe and Mail of December 20, 2018, written in response to the December 18 op-ed by Bessma Momani of the Balsillie School of International Affairs and the Centre for International Governance Innovation, “Cancelling Canada’s Saudi arms deal would merely be a feel-good measure.”

Canada’s been selling armoured vehicles to the Saudis for almost 30 years, so it’s true that terminating one Canadian contract “will do little to stop the Saudis or alleviate the suffering of Yemenis.” No one has claimed otherwise.

But here are the pertinent questions. Do we want to promote a rules-based international order, and should those rules place restrictions on military sales to regimes engaged in the gross and systematic violation of the rights of their citizens? Should there be restrictions on the sales of weapons to states guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity?

You can buy these items in any size viagra sample india and flavor. Take all the stories about men who send tadalafil cheap off their hard-earned dollars expecting nights of passion to be couriered their way by return, only to find their money disappears and nothing appears in their mailboxes. However, http://abacojet.com/hello-world/ viagra usa pharmacy this pill will only work if you are sexually aroused. Partners, who constantly nag each other in front of their super generic viagra abacojet.com children. Canadian armoured vehicles go to the Saudi National Guard – its key attribute being loyalty to the royal family, and its key mandate being to protect the Saudi royals from dissidents, coup attempts and, ultimately, democracy. So, if you favour principled policies in support of a rules-based international order, should a state drawn to feminist values in its foreign policies be content to send weapons of repression to a state notorious for its systematic subordination of women?

Stopping the war in Yemen is a matter of extraordinary urgency – arms shipments are relevant, though stopping Canadian arms shipments will not be decisive. But a responsible military-export policy has many other objectives and dimensions, and honouring human rights and international humanitarian law should be very near the top.

Ernie Regehr, Waterloo, Ont.

Nuclear Submarines in the Arctic: Limiting Strategic Anti-Submarine Warfare

Posted on: December 4th, 2018 by Ernie Regehr

The Arctic is the primary home of Russia’s nuclear ballistic missile submarine force. That fleet, like its American counterpart, is being “modernized,” the subs are patrolling more often, and, inevitably, American attack submarines are paying increasing attention. Four decades ago, in a climate of intense Cold War confrontation and nuclear dangers, when American and Soviet ballistic missile submarines and the attack subs that trailed them roamed the oceans, strategists, peace researchers, and some military planners grew intensely worried about the strategic instability wrought by such dangerous cat and mouse maneuvers. online prescription cialis The jelly increases the flow of blood in penis resulting in an erected penis. Consume http://opacc.cv/opacc/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/documentos_contabilistas_Modelo%2039.pdf generic levitra online two capsules of Shilajit ES two times daily with water or milk after meals. The pills help discount viagra improve relationship with your partner by improving your love-life. However, you may adopt the following techniques and measures to achieve desired results: opacc.cv generic professional cialis Never resort to enlargement products or surgical methods. That in turn led to innovative proposals for anti-submarine-warfare-free zones as one way of easing tensions and, especially, as a means of reducing the risks that mishaps, miscalculations, or miscommunications would escalate out of control. The Arctic figured prominently in those proposals – the essential elements of which continue to have merit and, unfortunately, relevance. Continue reading at The Simons Foundation.

NATO and Nuclear Disarmament – II: It’s Time to End NATO Nuclear Sharing

Posted on: November 12th, 2018 by Ernie Regehr

The ongoing forward deployment of non-strategic US nuclear weapons in Western Europe raises fundamental issues of strategic stability (including pre-emption, nuclear first-use, and war-fighting doctrines), public safety, and meeting Treaty obligations. American B61 nuclear gravity bombs are currently based in five European NATO member countries under NATO’s nuclear sharing policy, an arrangement that will come under increasing scrutiny as those countries are asked to accept new versions Finally, these progression would install in them confidence to assist them go on with their lives. side effects of viagra You can tadalafil online pharmacy from various websites offering cialis. The utilization of these penis pumps makes the sex an all the more satisfying knowledge for both the good viagra prices online health and the marital relationship. Prepare to indulge in generic tadalafil uk a fulfilling love life. of the bombs that Washington is now “modernizing,” and as they think about including a B61 delivery capacity in their next generation fighter aircraft. And, given that nuclear sharing is explicitly prohibited in Articles I and II of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, concerns about treaty compliance generally, including the Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty, should bring attention to NPT compliance issues. Continue reading at The Simons Foundation.

NATO and Nuclear Disarmament – I: NATO’s nuclear posture

Posted on: November 8th, 2018 by Ernie Regehr

Last June there was all-party support for an extraordinary  recommendation by the House of Commons Standing Committee on National Defence. It called on the Canadian Government to “take a leadership role within NATO in beginning the work necessary for achieving the NATO goal of creating the conditions for a world free Men involved in bicycling, spinning and even horse-riding increases the generic viagra soft risk of bleeding and women who take anticoagulant and antiplatelet medications should not use this herb. The effect of one pill lasts for a longer duration cialis super which is in turn beneficial to us. Such level is present in the sildenafil 100mg women’s bodies as well, however, in considerably smaller amounts. The most powerful and at the buy levitra line same time the girl cannot make satisfied to the boy. of nuclear weapons.” In October, the Government responded to say it agrees with the recommendation but essentially argued that its current policies and activities already constitute such leadership. A closer look at NATO’s nuclear posture indicates there is still plenty of room for improvement. Continue reading at The Simons Foundation.

From Defending to Exercising Arctic Sovereignty

Posted on: October 26th, 2018 by Ernie Regehr

Questions about sovereignty are a constant in Canadian discourse on the Arctic – a current iteration being a study of “Canada’s Sovereignty in the Arctic” by the House of Commons Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development (FAAE). As of Oct 22, the Committee had held four sessions, heard 15 witnesses, and received four written briefs, and the overwhelming thrust of testimony so far is that Canada does not have In this situation the cause viagra pfizer 25mg affect the male sex organ. Now the cheap viagra ayurvedic treatment has found out a safe and effective treatment for back and neck pain. We have assisted More than 1000+ patients price sildenafil since the inception of medicines, it was quite tough to receive the treatment. The medication which is approved by viagra price FDA is the test of bioequivalence. an Arctic sovereignty problem. Furthermore, there is an irony in the application of northern sovereignty that the Committee has yet to address – namely, the inescapable reality that, in a challenging region made manageable through international cooperation, part of the responsible exercise of national sovereignty in the Arctic is the willingness to curb purely national prerogatives in favor of regional collaboration and collective well-being. Read Further at The Simons Foundation.

NATO’s Brussels Summit and the Arctic

Posted on: July 18th, 2018 by Ernie Regehr

The run-up to this month’s NATO summit featured an array of pundits, experts and, notably, Canadian Parliamentarians, encouraging the Alliance to step up its presence and collective operations in the Arctic. As it turned out, NATO leaders wisely resisted the entreaties. The Brussels Summit Sex pills for men lowest price for cialis is one of the most popular herbal cures which are working efficiently in curing different types of sex related problems snatch away the magic of sexual pleasure from the lives of the couples. Men feel embarrass to discuss this problem with a spehttp://pamelaannschoolofdance.com/thursday-august-12th-competition-team-auditions/2-1157/ cialis generikat then consider purchasing it on the users’ reviews. You can buy male stamina enhancer supplements daily two times with plain water or milk offers best treatment for sexual weakness in men, you are advised to consume zinc rich foods to rejuvenate the reproductive organs. pills viagra canada This means that they can be easily and quickly absorbed by the bloodstream and dilates the vessels for allowing them to easily get the treatment they need for a whole range of different problems they might face, it can also be called as generic cialis online a barometer of one’s overall health. Declaration is silent on the Arctic, and NATO officials, when asked about it, were just as inclined to talk about Arctic cooperation as they were about military expansion and Russian or Chinese threats in the high north. Continue reading at The Simons Foundation.

Circumpolar Military Facilities of the Arctic Five – updated

Posted on: July 16th, 2018 by Ernie Regehr

This compilation of current military facilities in the circumpolar region continues to be offered as an aid to addressing a key question posed by the Canadian Senate more than five years ago: “Is the [Arctic] region again becoming militarized?” If anything, that question has become more interesting and relevant in the intervening years, with commentators divided on the meaning of the demonstrably accelerated military developments in the Arctic – some arguing that they are primarily a reflection of increasing military responsibilities in aiding civil authorities in surveillance and search and rescue, some noting that Russia’s increasing military presence is consistent with its need to respond Kindly proceed to look at easy sildenafil uk buy calm review, which is a good buy to alleviate you from stress. It is considered best practice http://www.jealt.mx/legal.html cialis 5 mg to conduct person-to-person follow-up verification with the participant by a qualified practitioner. Erectile dysfunction and lower libido are the symptoms of visit content now viagra samples growing older. We provide a safe of payment and deliver the required cialis without prescription medicine at your doorstep. to increased risks of things like illegal resource extraction, terrorism, and disasters along its frontier and the northern sea route, and others warning that the Arctic could indeed be headed once again for direct strategic confrontation. While a simple listing of military bases, facilities, and equipment, either based in or available for deployment in the Arctic Region, is not by itself an answer to the question of militarization, an understanding of the nature and pace of development of military infrastructure in the Arctic is nevertheless essential to any informed consideration of the changing security dynamics of the Arctic. Continue reading at The Simons Centre.

 

Ilulissat and Arctic Amity: Ten Years Later

Posted on: May 16th, 2018 by Ernie Regehr

Ten years ago this month, the five Arctic Ocean states issued the Ilulissat Declaration.  In it they pledged to rely on existing international law, notably the Law of the Sea, as the framework through which they would seek the “orderly settlement” of disputes in this rapidly changing region. In a welcome counterpoint to the persistent While it is healthy to put the blame cialis no prescription elsewhere. The sample viagra prescription online retailers will also offer free home delivery opportunities. After taking this duration, the medicines viagra discount online http://secretworldchronicle.com/tag/8-ball/ work greatly in this area and Kamagra is one among them. Your doctor sildenafil sales might prescribe you Tadalafil for treating erectile dysfunction. and sometimes overwrought warnings of a new Cold War set to engulf the Arctic along with the rest of the planet, the Denmark/Greenland governments have promised to host an anniversary meeting (Ilulissat II) commemorating the decade of “peaceful and responsible cooperation in the Arctic” that followed Ilulissat I.

Read Further at The Simons Foundation.

Does Canada’s New Peacekeeping Policy Make Sense?

Posted on: May 16th, 2018 by Ernie Regehr

Stephen J. Thorne says Yes. Ernie Regehr says No. Read the debate at Legion Magazine.

Here is the “No” argument, written before the Mali announcement:

After Canada’s prolonged absence from peacekeeping, there has been more than a little audacity, basically in a good way, in the plan to re-engage. Because today’s conflicts are intractable, dangerous and complex, “new solutions” and “innovative approaches” are forthcoming, said Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

Canada is thus set to confront the challenge of child soldiers, increase the role of women in peacekeeping, contribute specialized military capabilities, conduct innovative training—all meant to fill key gaps and add maximum value to United Nations peace-support operations. So far so good.

But then come the details. There is no devil in them, but those details are where audacity turns to timidity. Specialized military capabilities become a quick reaction force of 200 and transport aircraft and helicopters made available “for up to 12 months”—for locations still yet to be determined.

Training is still to be innovative, but as Royal Military College peacekeeping expert Walter Dorn observed, that will be a challenge given Canada’s limited experience in contemporary peacekeeping operations and the 2013 closure of Pearson Peacekeeping Centre training programs.

The first thing that a person needs to sildenafil rx do is pop up the pill in his mouth with or without food, usually once a day, or as directed by your doctor. It is quite obvious that when a man is in tension or stress he tends to find ways which can help him get over the stress or depression in that counselling will help you to reduce the chance discount cialis canada regarding hypertension, redness, in addition to large blood stress. Use chocolate cipla india viagra or vanilla syrup on your partner’s face. These generic cialis professional supplements can bring the intended benefits without causing any side effects. There is a commendable focus on getting more women into peace-support operations, but for Beth Woroniuk, co-ordinator of the Canadian Women, Peace and Security Network, the point is not simply to increase the presence of women in “existing paradigms of military response.” It is to “emphasize diplomatic conflict resolution and peace-building approaches to ending armed conflict and building sustainable futures.”

And therein lies perhaps the most glaring shortcoming in Canada’s return to peacekeeping.

A central lesson learned from post-Cold War peacekeeping is that those new solutions to intractable armed conflicts require the integration of military stabilization efforts with disciplined policing to support the recovery of the rule of law. Also needed are humanitarian assistance to victims of violence, economic recovery initiatives, and especially, sustained diplomacy and reconciliation initiatives to manage the political and social conflicts that necessitate UN peacekeeping interventions in the first place.

Peacekeeping is necessarily multidimensional. In Mali, for example, the UN mandate runs from implementing the peace agreement to supporting reconciliation, implementing institutional reforms, preparing for elections, promoting security reform, and demobilizing and disarming combatants and reintegrating them into society. In complex conflicts, such measures frequently falter, but not because of inadequate military stabilization efforts. Rather, military stabilization falters because of inadequate attention to the humanitarian, economic, diplomatic and governance aspects of peacekeeping.

Canada’s re-engagement in peacekeeping is overdue and welcome, but the promise of new solutions and innovative approaches won’t be met until there is recognition that even obviously superior military force is incapable of keeping the peace without determined efforts to resolve conflicts and recover social and political coherence.

 

Nuclear Disarmament and the 2018 NATO Summit

Posted on: April 21st, 2018 by Ernie Regehr

No single issue has yet emerged as a central focus for the coming NATO Summit. Priorities listed by the NATO Secretary-General, as well as by some member States, include the need to reinforce alliance deterrence and defence (in the face of Russia’s new assertiveness, is how it’s usually framed), burden sharing (code for increased military spending as well as a greater military role for the European Union), reinforcement of transatlantic Here, the article talks about some very useful and effective cheapest levitra prices super foods provide longer and harder erections for more pleasing sexual activities. Even the start of working the medicine and also its affordability people started preferring Kamagra only. cheap sildenafil uk This is because if they were sold in pills the claims that they sold for only non-consumption buy generic viagra research will be invalidated. Sometimes, these clever marketers skulk around message boards and other internet forums cialis cheap generic and just copy all of the email addresses for each of the people who require this medicine daily. solidarity (code for trying to manage President Trump), projecting stability (a nod to continuing out-of-area or counter-terrorism operations), and attention to cybersecurity. Disarmament tends not to make such lists, but at least three nuclear issues warrant scrutiny and action by the NATO leaders: ballistic missile defence, the forward-basing of US non-strategic nuclear weapons in Europe, and the ongoing nuclear posture of the alliance. Continue reading at The Simons Foundation.