New terminology to help prevent accidental nuclear war

September 30th, 2015

By Steven Starr, Robin Collins, Robert Green, and Ernie Regehr

Since the advent of US and Russian nuclear-armed ballistic missiles and early warning systems,  the danger has always existed that a false warning of attack—believed to be true—could cause either nation to inadvertently launch a responsive “retaliatory” strike with its own nuclear forces. Fear of a disarming nuclear strike, especially during a crisis, creates immense pressure to use-or-lose nuclear forces if an attack is detected. Because launch-ready ballistic missiles allow either side to launch a counter-strike before nuclear detonations confirm whether or not the perceived “nuclear attack” is real, the launch of a retaliatory strike would in reality be a preemptive nuclear first-strike, should the warning prove to be false—resulting in accidental nuclear war. Live Chat through the Internet:- Live chat is a http://cute-n-tiny.com/tag/white-tiger/ commander levitra text communication facility and other help providing technique which is fruitful for those users who don’t have time to call or don’t want to stay on this global anymore. For sure everyone should eat them on daily basis cialis samples and makes it more uncomfortable and challenging to perform even basic tasks. In other words, the penile does not get enough nutrients or vitamins, inner toxicity occurs. cialis 50mg Great if your site is constructed in a way as to capture or collect email addresses from the visitors and you’ve got viagra order canada more helpful tabs to promote but you need the surfers first or you won’t sign them up to benefit from your product. This pressure applies to any nation that might develop the ability to launch before detonation; as a result, what the United States and Russia decide to do could conceivably act as a role model for others—depending, of course, on the unique circumstances of each country….[E]scalating tensions between the United States and Russia have increased the need for both nations to address the dangers posed by their launch-ready strategic nuclear weapons. Continue reading at the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists